Svetlania Wheneverly

Posted in comics with tags , , , , on July 6, 2009 by Murcia

I enjoyed Svetlana Chmakova’s short comics. There’s not much to them but they are funny and cute.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Issues with Vampire Diaries

Posted in books, fantasy with tags , , , on July 5, 2009 by Murcia

I am dense.

After my post on the news that L. J. Smith’s Vampire Diaries is coming to television, I got a lot of comments on the casting.  One of the issues brought up is why the main character Elena was not cast as a blonde for the TV show.  I was puzzled because I thought blondes were the it girls in Hollywood too.

But then I realized this:

Vampire Diaries, Elena in graveyard
Elena, Vampire Diaries

Bella Swan
Bella, Twilight

Mystery solved.

Another thing that irritates me is much of the material on Vampire Diaries outright saying that it is another version of Twilight. (TVsquad, beyond hollywood).   The producers are on riding Twilight’s cape but I am still irritated.

L. J. Smith published the books in 1991.  It seems that Meyer only had the dream in 2003 and the first book was published in 2005.  Moreover, most pretty-pretty vampire stories are just watered-down versions of Anne Rice’s vampire talesTwilight is more of a blanched vegetable version.

I remember a young person writing on a forum that she’d read Meyer’s series and asking, in sum, if there were any other stories with a  vampire mythos.

Part of me thinks this is (very) funny but it’s a little sad too.  She’s missing out a lot. Fans could go a long time and not run out of vamp books to read.

I may break down and find a time line of pretty-pretty vampires in books.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Romance Novel Covers, I See Now

Posted in books, romance with tags , , , , , , on July 3, 2009 by Murcia

I was reading The Dames, Dolls and Delinquents: A Collector’s Guide to Sexy Pulp Fiction Paperbacks by Gary Lovisi. Well, I couldn’t manage the whole thing. But I read the introduction and the chapter on “romance” and learned a few things.

I didn’t jot down the names but this is what I understood:

In the 1940s and 1950s, the art department for publishers of inexpensive fiction sent detailed instructions to artists who drew sleazy covers. The books were aimed at heterosexual men and were pretty smutty if the titles and blurbs were to be believed.

Many of them featured a disrobing or disrobed girl, sometimes at the mercy of a fully clothed man.  One cover amused me with its cover: a topless girl whose chest is delicately hidden by a tree branch.

Here’s where it gets interesting.  According to Lovisi’s research, many of the these same artists started working on the clinch covers for romance novels.  To my mind, it’s no wonder a lot of romance novels in the 1970s and later had partially undressed women and men in sleazy poses.  There’s no point in an old dog learning a new trick.

This may be old hat to romance fans but I feel that I’ve discovered why some romance novels used to have those appalling covers.

On the positive side, I did like many of these romance covers.  Link.  “Silent in the Sanctuary” and “Firefly Lane” were my favorites.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Books I’ve Read in June 2009

Posted in books with tags , , , , , on June 30, 2009 by Murcia

Very little nonfiction taken in this month. I was surprised by how touched I was by Bourdain’s food book. Makes me want to look up his other books.  I’ve read several of Cameron’s artist way books but I like this one the best. The exercises are streamlined and the essays are enjoyable.

  1. The Apron Book: Making, Wearing and Sharing a bit of Cloth and Comfort by EllynAnne Geisel (2006)
  2. No Reservations: Around the World on an Empty Stomach by Anthony Bourdain (2007)
  3. The Outliers: The Story of Success by Malcolm Gladwell (2008)
  4. The World’s Best Indoor Games by Brandeth Gyles (1982)
  5. Best Editorial Cartoons of the Year ed. by Charles Brooks (2008)
  6. Right to Write: An Invitation and Initiation into the Writing Life by Julia Cameron (1998)

Here is my picture book and juvenile book list. This month I’ve been trying to read Newbery Award winners.  I was disappointed by Tale of Despereaux – far too precious for my taste.  Midwife’s Apprentice was much better than Cushman’s other book, Catherine, Called Birdy. Midwife’s Apprentice was highly enjoyable.  I liked Walk Two Moons and A Year Down Yonder too.  The Higher Power of Lucky is the type of book I avoided at all costs as child and teen.  Pointless story and vapid characters.  The Gammage Cup was a satire a genre which I don’t usually enjoy.  This one was fun.

    1. The Gammage Cup by Carol Kendall (1959)
    2. Three Little Pigs by James Marshall (1989)
    3. Stink: The Incredible Shrinking Kid #1 by Megan MacDonald (2005)
    4. Tale of Despereaux by Kate DiCamillo (2006)
    5. The Midwife’s Apprentice by Karen Cushman (1996)
    6. The Higher Power of Lucky by Susan Patron (2008)
    7. A Year Down Yonder by Richard Peck (2002)
    8. A Single Shard by Linda Sue Park (2003)
    9. Walk Two Moons by Sharon Creech (1996)
    10. The Sleeping Beauty by Trina Schart Hyman (1977)
    11. Happily-Ever-After Book by Jack Kent (1976)

Mostly read fun stuff for my YA and adult books.  Their Eyes Were Watching God surprised me by how much it delighted me.  I’d read experts and critiques which made it seem like a dry and miserable reading.  It’s actually fresh and charming.  The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian reminds me of talking to some people with horrific childhoods.  They make you laugh and then later the sheer tragedy of their story startles you into tears.  Good book.  I’m glad there is a sequel.

    1. The Marquis Takes a Bride by Marion Chesney (1987)
    2. Sweet Masquerade by Marion Chesney (1984)
    3. First Comes Marriage by Mary Balogh (2009)
    4. Their Eyes Were Watching God by Zora Neale Hurston (1937)
    5. The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian by Sherman Alexie (2007)
    6. The Maze in the Heart of the Castle by Dorothy Gilman (1999)

Interview with Sherman Alexie about Amazon’s Kindle.

Aelita: Queen of Mars (1924)

Posted in movies, science fiction with tags , , , , , , on June 24, 2009 by Murcia
Poster for the Soviet movie Aelita (1927), by ...
Image via Wikipedia

Here is the full science fiction movie list.

The first of my science fiction watching project is a silent USSR film featuring life on Mars.  My friends and I enjoyed our ribald and goofy comments a lot more than the movie itself.

There were three distinct sections of the movie: Mars, Earth and the bag of sugar.

MARS

The scenes on Mars were the best by far. The geometric sets were striking.  Even Gor, the guardian of energy, had a triangle-shaped key ring.  I liked the diagonally sliding door as well.

Aelita’s headdresses were my favorite bit of costuming.  The headdress you see in most of the stills resembles a spiny sea creature, it’s even stranger when she moves.  One of her gowns encouraged me to think she had three breasts.  This would have been very alien of her, if it had been true.  Alas, it’s just an unnerving costume choice.

I learned that Martians know nothing of kisses because Aelita learns a lot when she spies on Earthling Los & his wife Natasha.  The alien woman learning about sex from humans is cliched but she’s intense about it which makes it funny.

It seems the queen’s maid Ihoshka knows more about these matters.  Ihoshka flirts with the soldiers in robotic uniforms at length during one scene and she quickly takes to an Earth man when the space ship arrives on Mars.

Stealthiness must mean something different on Mars.  Ihoshka skulks about the castle in the most obvious way.  She has a wretched outfit for sneaking, I admit.  Her gown is surrounded by caging wires. Nevertheless, no one can see her even when she’s standing in their direct line of sight.  Perhaps Martians have vision problems.

One scene was too funny to take serious.  The bold Martian soldiers attack members of a rebellion with flashlights. I think they were meant to be lasers (?).  I was taken aback when a third of the Martian’s working population was “refrigerated” but I think it was about cryogenics.

EARTH

The protagonist and definite anti-hero of the film is an depressed engineer named Los.  He finds life fairly worthless, judging by his expression and body language.  One thing perks him up, a mysterious message of three words transmitted over the airwaves.  Los becomes convinced that it is a message from Mars. and begins his long quest to build a rocket ship to Mars.  He begins designing a rocket ship.  Things look pretty exciting until the main plot takes over.

THE BAG OF SUGAR

The main storyline is that of a misappropriated bag of sugar.

As this film portrays it, the USSR in the 1920s was a bad place to live.  The trains were disease carrying and overcrowded; and housing and food staples were limited. At one point, a character was bribing another with baked goods.  Their clothes were ugly and their shoes were rags.  Everything was dirty and everyone was cold.

The bag of sugar is stolen and the movie takes a generous portion of the running time to trace the hiding of the sugar, the eventual investigation, the subterfuge and various twists in the sugar plot.

I found that there were too many characters and got a little mixed up about which badly dressed character had what goal.  The good thing about Mars is that everyone was quite distinctive in appearance.

EARTH AGAIN

Despite his obsession with Mars, Los takes time out to deal with his domestic life. Los goes a lot bonkers with jealousy over his wife Natasha’s friendiless.  Los’ wife is entirely innocent but Los is channeling Othello and alternates between neglect and pettish anger with her.  The sugar, Mars and Earth plots collide in a supremely disturbing and wrong ending.

N. B.  Natasha wears the ugliest dress in cinematic history, just so you know.

SPOILERS

Read more »

Odd Thomas by Dean Koontz

Posted in books, fantasy with tags , on June 23, 2009 by Murcia
Cover of "Odd Thomas"
Cover of Odd Thomas

My sister urged me to read Dean Koontz’s Odd Thomas. I have read Watchers and other books by Koontz and had seen Odd on bookshelves but I had not read it. I couldn’t place. Friends and reviews used terms like “quirky” “charming” “sweet” but told me it’s about a thriller about a possible shooting. The blurb on the back didn’t help, “Odd sees dead people but then he does something about it.” Humph.

But I started reading it and now I understand why I couldn’t place it. Odd Thomas himself is innocent in that he has a good heart and an uncompromising sense of right and wrong, though he attributes his conscience to his girl friend Stormy. Odd does his best to think well of people and he risks himself repeatedly to find justice for the murdered dead. So, the quirky, charming, feel-good part is true.

The thriller part is true too. Odd can see ghosts and help them leave, usually by exposing their murderer. He can’t talk to them though. This time, he must hope his psychic abilities come through because he finds himself hunting down a very live mass murderer.

I liked Odd’s girlfriend and his boss – the manager of a diner. He spends as much time discussing his job as a fry cook at the diner as he does on the supernatural events that surrounds him.

It’s worth reading, though a bit rough in places.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Science Fiction Movie Project

Posted in movies, science fiction with tags , , , , , on June 18, 2009 by Murcia
Yuliya Solntseva as Aelita
Image via Wikipedia

Just finished Aelita: Queen of Mars - the 1924 silent USSR movie. It was not quite what I was expecting. It’s entertaining but I don’t recommend it either. I’ll add the full review later.

Full list here.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

More from G.R.O.S.S. (Get Rid Of Slimy girlS)

Posted in awkward, comics, internet with tags , , , on June 17, 2009 by Murcia
Susie Derkins, Calvin's next-door neighbor
Image via Wikipedia

I stopped reading blogs on ‘mainstream’ N.A. comics because each time I did I felt angry and depressed.  But once in a while, I still run into these girls-drool-boys-rule news items.

A new post on Comics Worth Reading is about gender targeted contests and articles.  The L. A. Times article “Girls’ Guide to Comic Con 2009” caught my attention.

Charlie Jane Anders rips it apart, and the final line made me laugh.

Thom Zahler is so incensed that he’s giving away free comics.

Anyhow back to the article.  It was meant, I think, to convey that not only does Comic Con permit females to attend but they might find one or two events enjoyable.

I pointed out on CWR that the second sentence reads, “And it’s not all just about the influx of squealing “Twilight” girls, either.”  Well, and good.  Nothing like alienating fans of a popular author like Meyer.  But the best part is that the article points out that werewolves are hot; vampires are hot; guys in mecha suits are hot; vampires are hot; reptilian aliens are hot.  It’s not that I disagree, far from it.  My question is why the digs at paranormal romance fans and then direct your comments to that audience.

At long last, I’m a fan of Dollhouse.  However, it’s a little off-putting to find an Active/Doll referred to as butt-kicking. Sure she is, just like Pinocchio. It’s also painfully amusing to read that Echo is “airheady” not that she is drugged and that her mind is constantly wiped.

And the only interest any woman could have in Whiteout and Inglourious Basterds is their hot male actors.

Yar.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

1001 Movies (262 to 302)

Posted in 1001 Movies with tags , , on June 16, 2009 by Murcia

You know that book, 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die by Stephen Jay Schneider? I don’t know if I would watch some of these if I only had a little time left. I mean I’m sure they all have cinematic significance but not all of them are fun. If I were about to shuffle off the mortal coil, I wouldn’t want to watch a bunch of lame movies just beforehand.

So, I went through the ones I’d seen to check.

Movies 1-60 ::  Movies 61-100 ::  Movies 101-160 :: Movies 161-220

Movies 221-260 ::  Movies 261-300

On the rating system:
Watch anytime: Superb entertainment
Repeat viewing: Good entertainment
Worth once: if you’ve nothing better to do
Historical significance: not for pleasure

Based on 2004 edition.

No. 262. Gentlemen Prefer Blondes (1953)
Type: musical
Rating: repeat viewing
Comments: This movie is a lot of fun. Rosalind Russel is even more appealing than Marilyn Monroe and she’s pretty cute.

No. 267. Shane (1953)
Type: western
Rating: historical significance
This movie seemed drenched in glorified self-pity. I refuse to see it again to reassess it.

No. 271. Seven Brides for Seven Brothers (1954)
Type: musical
Rating: repeat viewing
Comments: The barn raising dance is infectious fun.  The premise of abducting brides is difficult to accept.

No. 272. Les Diaboliques (1954)
Type: crime
Rating: worth once
Comments: A pretty good mystery and good characterization.

No. 274. Rear Window (1954)
Type: mystery
Rating: worth once
Comments: A bit dated but it brings to fore the urge toward voyeurism in all of us.  This is one movie I’d like to see a sequel/remake of.

No. 281. Carmen Jones (1954)
Type: musical
Rating: worth once
Comments: Good music and a good performance.

No. 285. Guys and Dolls (1955)
Type: musical
Rating: worth once
Marlon Brando makes a strange song-and-dance man but Frank Sinatra is entertaining here.

No. 291. Marty (1955)
Type: romance
Rating: worth once
Comments: An understated romance. It’s well-done but hard to get excited about.

No. 294. Kiss Me Deadly (1955)
Type: crime
Rating: historical significance
This is an interesting film noir with an ending that spirals out of control.

No. 296. Rebel Without a Cause (1955)
Type: drama
Rating: historical significance
Comments: James Dean is appealing and gives a good performance, everyone is tedious.

No. 300. The Night of the Hunter (1955)
Type: suspense
Rating: worth once
Comments: Compelling thriller with children in jeopardy.

No. 302. Forbidden Planet (1956)
Type: science fiction
Rating: historical significance
Dumb comic relief moments but an interesting interpretation of Shakespeare’s The Tempest.

After the break is the full list from 262 to 302:
Read more »

7 Kid’s Books that should be Movies

Posted in books, movies with tags , , , , , , , , on June 15, 2009 by Murcia

These are all gentle stories of the every day life of families.  They are old-fashioned and charming.

Baby Island by Carol Ryrie Brink

What: 2 girls are shipwrecked on a island with 4 babies.  Robinson Crusoe for the tween set.

What’s in it for me:  An updated version on a pretty island with lots of cute toddlers would be so much fun.

BookAngles

Wikipedia

The Moffats by Eleanor Estes

What: Set during World War I, children of single mom get into scrapes.

What’s in it for me:  I like sweet family adventures and this one is still relevant.

Wikipedia

Homespun Light

Key to the Treasure by Peggy Parish

What: 3 kids investigate family mystery by solving puzzles.

What’s in it for me:  I love treasure hunting and they could use all kinds of gadgets to update it.

Book Lounge

Henry Reed’s Journey by Keith Robertson

What:   Teenage boy on family vacation across America gets in scrapes.

What’s in it for me:  Travelogue and wacky situations – just the ticket.

Wikipedia on the character Henry Reed

Henry Reed series

Betsy-Tacy by Maud Hart Lovelace

What:  Turn of the century life for 3 girls and their strong friendship.

What’s in it for me:  I think this would make a lovely TV series like Anne of Green Gables.

Betsy – Tacy Society

Wikipedia

Fan Site

All of a Kind Family by Sidney Taylor

What:  Another turn of the century family in NYC.

What’s in it for me:   I identified completely with these sisters and want to see them portrayed by actresses.

Tenement Museum

Many Moons by James Thurber

What:  A small princess wishes for the moon.

What’s in it for me:  This would make a lovely animated short.

Wikipedia

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]